Destroying the Long House: Defeating Feminist Rule

Explore the concept of the 'long house'—a female-ruled society—and learn strategies to reclaim male leadership and restore biblical order in culture and family.

Understanding the "Long House": Origins and Meaning

The concept of the "long house" has become a recurring theme in certain corners of cultural and political discourse, especially among those critical of contemporary social trends. But what exactly is the long house, and why has it become such a focal point for debate?

The term itself is borrowed from the communal dwellings of various Native American and indigenous groups, where matriarchal forces often held sway. In its modern usage, the "long house" is a metaphor for a society or institution dominated by feminine norms and values, often to the exclusion or suppression of masculine energy and traditional male leadership. It is a society where men are passive, hierarchies of competence are replaced by quotas, and safety and emotional affirmation are elevated above risk, adventure, and achievement.

This metaphor is not just about gender; it is about the broader cultural shift toward what critics see as a stifling, bureaucratic, and emotionally driven mode of governance and social organization. The long house is characterized by indirect conflict, speech policing, and a relentless focus on safety and inclusivity, often at the expense of truth, freedom, and excellence.

The Rise of the Long House

The roots of the long house can be traced to the sexual revolution of the 1960s and the subsequent rise of women in the workforce and social institutions. While women still make up a small percentage of Fortune 500 CEOs, they dominate fields like human resources, compliance, and education—roles that shape the behavioral norms and speech codes of modern society.

This shift has been celebrated by some as a long-overdue correction of historical injustices. For example, Hannah Rosen's 2010 Atlantic article, "The End of Men and the Rise of Women," heralded the increasing influence of women in all areas of life. Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign slogan, "The Future is Female," echoed this sentiment.

But critics argue that this new order is not a utopia of equality and fairness. Instead, they see it as a subversion of the natural order, where the worst aspects of feminine behavioral norms—emotionalism, indirect conflict, and a fixation on safety—are codified into law and policy. The result is what they call the long house: a society where men are emasculated, speech is policed, and ambition is suspect.

The Characteristics of the Long House

Indirect Conflict and Cancel Culture

One of the defining features of the long house is the way it handles conflict. Rather than direct confrontation, offenses are dealt with through social ostracism, reputation attacks, and public humiliation—what we now call cancel culture. As psychologist Jonathan Haidt has noted, this is not an absence of conflict but a different kind of conflict, one that mobilizes social resources to punish those who break the norms.

Speech Policing and Affirmation

In the long house, the highest value in public discourse is not truth or free speech, but the avoidance of offense and harm. Speech norms are designed to provide affirmation, even for behaviors that might seem bizarre or controversial. Dissenting voices are silenced in the name of tolerance, and controversial scientific findings or political opinions are censored to protect feelings.

Research shows that women, especially young, single, and college-educated women, are more likely to support censorship and to view hate speech as violence. This has profound implications for academic freedom, public debate, and the ability to challenge prevailing orthodoxies.

Safetyism and the Suppression of Masculinity

Another hallmark of the long house is what Haidt calls "safetyism"—the belief that safety is the highest moral good. This was on full display during the COVID-19 pandemic, when unprecedented restrictions on personal freedom were justified in the name of reducing harm.

In the long house, risk-taking, ambition, and male competition are viewed with suspicion. Boys who are rambunctious or competitive are censured, and masculinity is often labeled as toxic unless it is rebranded in a way that is subservient to feminine norms.

Bureaucratic Control and the HR Regime

The long house is enforced through bureaucratic institutions, especially human resources departments, which are overwhelmingly staffed by women. These departments set the rules for workplace behavior and speech, often in line with progressive and feminist ideals. The result is a culture where compliance and emotional safety are prioritized over merit and free expression.

The Infallibility of Women

A striking feature of the long house is the near-impossibility of holding women accountable for their actions, even in institutions that are nominally led by men. In both secular and religious contexts, there is a strong prohibition against confronting female sins, except in cases where women are accused of not loving themselves enough. This double standard is evident in movements like #MeToo, where the mantra "believe all women" has sometimes led to the celebration of female wrongdoers while male offenders are vilified.

The Historical Roots of the Long House

While the long house may seem like a recent phenomenon, its roots go back much further. C.S. Lewis, writing in the 1950s, critiqued the rise of female rule and emotionalism in his Narnia series, particularly in "The Silver Chair." Lewis described a school run by a "hysterical woman," where fairness and equality became oppressive and moral chaos reigned.

The modern long house, however, owes much to the feminist and Marxist movements of the 20th century. Figures like Betty Friedan, a Marxist agitator and author of "The Feminine Mystique," sought to undermine traditional father rule in the home and society. The spread of critical theory from Frankfurt, Germany, into American academia and education further entrenched these ideas.

The transformation of the education system, the rise of women in the workforce, and the dominance of left-leaning, college-educated women in key institutions have all contributed to the construction of the long house. The result is a society where traditional male roles are devalued, and feminine norms are enforced through both formal and informal means.

How the Long House Was Built

The Church's Capitulation

One of the first institutions to fall to the long house was the church. Rather than upholding traditional male leadership in the home, church, and society, many churches embraced feminist ideas and allowed women to exert increasing influence. This shift was not limited to liberal denominations; even conservative and reformed churches often became functionally ruled by the emotional states of their leaders' wives.

The Embrace of Feminism

Cultural acceptance of feminist ideas, even in their so-called moderate forms, paved the way for the long house. The feminist movement, influenced by Marxist theory, sought to dismantle traditional gender roles and promote equality at all costs. This ideology spread from academia to corporations, bureaucracies, media, and eventually the home.

The Transformation of Education

Critical theorists from the Frankfurt School, such as Herbert Marcuse, introduced concepts like "repressive tolerance," which justified the suppression of dissenting views in the name of progress. The education system became a breeding ground for these ideas, shaping the political and social attitudes of generations of students.

The impact is evident in voting patterns: while non-college-educated white women tend to vote Republican, college-educated white women overwhelmingly support Democratic candidates. Control of education means control of the future.

The Feminization of the Workforce

As more women entered the workforce, especially in roles that shape organizational culture (like HR and compliance), the long house extended its reach. The dominance of women in these fields has been a key driver of the shift toward progressive and feminist norms in the workplace.

Strategies for Destroying the Long House

If the long house is as pervasive and destructive as critics claim, how can it be dismantled? The answer, according to proponents of this view, lies in a return to principled conviction, masculine leadership, and the rejection of safetyism and bureaucratic control.

Rediscovering Ancient Wisdom

Western civilization was built on firm Christian conviction and principle. Rather than seeking new and fashionable solutions, critics argue that we must return to the "ancient wells" of wisdom—rediscovering the teachings of church fathers and the biblical order of male and female roles.

Revising History

The long house maintains its power in part by controlling the historical narrative. To counter this, it is necessary to challenge revisionist history and to tell the truth about controversial events and figures, even when it is unpopular.

Reclaiming the Home

Perhaps the most important battleground is the home. Men must refuse to let their households become long houses, ruled by the emotional states of their wives or daughters. Conviction alone is not enough; action is required to confront and correct dysfunctional dynamics.

Building Tribes of Courageous Men

Men need communities of like-minded, courageous peers who are willing to stand up to the long house and support one another. This means forming tribes that value theological maximalism—applying all of scripture to all of life—and encouraging one another to confront female sins and societal dysfunction.

Embracing Risk and Rejecting Safetyism

Safety cannot be the highest value. Meaningful achievements require risk, and men must be willing to say and do things that may get them in trouble. This includes rejecting the culture of safetyism and embracing a policy of "safety third."

Strengthening Body and Mind

Physical strength and competence are seen as antidotes to the weakness promoted by the long house. Men are encouraged to take care of their bodies, pursue strength, and reject the culture of weakness and passivity.

Using Humor and Memes

Ridicule and humor are powerful tools for undermining the long house. Memes and playful scorn can expose the absurdity of certain positions and help build a sense of camaraderie among those who resist.

Reforming Education

Education must be reclaimed from the long house. This means creating schools with a strong masculine presence, especially for boys, and rejecting the idea that public education is a neutral or safe environment for Christian children.

Creating Male-Friendly Workplaces

The dominance of women in HR and compliance has made many workplaces inhospitable to men. Reviving the trades, starting small businesses, and refusing to play by long house rules are seen as ways to create spaces where men can thrive.

Confronting the Conservative Long House

The long house is not limited to the left; it can also be found in conservative circles. It is necessary to confront hypocrisy and double standards within the conservative movement, even when it is uncomfortable.

Raising Daughters for the Home

Fathers are urged not to encourage their daughters to become "boss babes" or to seek fulfillment primarily in the public or political sphere. Instead, the focus should be on cultivating Titus 2 womanhood—building up the home and family.

Speaking the Unpopular Truth

Finally, the most important strategy is to speak the truth, no matter how unpopular. This means refusing to abide by the speech codes of the long house, confronting taboo subjects, and having the courage to say what needs to be said, even at personal cost.

Conclusion: The Path Forward

The long house, as described by its critics, represents a fundamental shift in the values and structures of Western society. It is a society where feminine norms dominate, masculine energy is suppressed, and safety and affirmation are elevated above truth and achievement.

Destroying the long house requires more than nostalgia for a bygone era. It demands a return to principled conviction, the rebuilding of male leadership in all spheres of life, and the courage to confront the idols and taboos of our time. It means reclaiming the home, the church, the workplace, and the public square from the grip of bureaucratic and emotional control.

Above all, it requires men and women alike to rediscover their God-given roles and to build families, communities, and institutions that reflect the wisdom of the ages. Only then can we hope to escape the suffocating embrace of the long house and restore a society built on truth, freedom, and excellence.

Destroying Gynocracy & Burning Down The Longhouse - Eric Conn

The Ultimate Fat Loss Formula: Protein, Caffeine, Creatine, and Exercise Explained

Looking to shed fat effectively? Years of research into fat loss reveal three powerhouse tools for transforming your body: protein, caffeine, and exercise. Let’s dive into the science behind each and share practical ways to incorporate them into your life, based on cutting-edge studies and real-world insights.

Protein: Your Secret Weapon for Fat Loss

Protein is widely known for building muscle, but its ability to burn fat is often underestimated. Studies consistently show that resistance-trained individuals who increase calories from protein alone don’t gain body fat—in fact, they often lose it. Here’s why protein is a fat-loss superstar.

Why Protein Burns Fat

In a controlled study, resistance-trained women consumed either 1.2 g/kg of body weight in protein or a higher 2.4 g/kg daily. Both groups trained under supervision, and the high-protein group not only gained more muscle but also lost significant body fat compared to their baseline. Other research pushed protein intake to 3.3–4.4 g/kg, adding 500–700 calories daily, yet participants either maintained or shed fat.

Protein’s fat-burning magic isn’t limited to athletes. In a study with women aged 50–80 who had low muscle mass but normal body weight, increasing protein from 0.9 to 1.3 g/kg—without exercise—led to more muscle and less fat compared to a control group.

What makes protein so effective? It has a high thermic effect, burning 20–30% of its calories during digestion (compared to 5–10% for carbs and 0–3% for fat). It also boosts satiety through hormones like peptide YY, helping you eat less. Most importantly, protein directs calories toward muscle repair rather than fat storage, acting as a nutrient partitioning agent.

Does Protein Timing Matter?

A 2023 study turned heads by showing that a massive 100 g dose of milk protein post-workout sustained amino acid delivery to muscles for 12 hours, increasing muscle protein synthesis (MPS) by 20% more than a 25 g dose. This challenges the myth that consuming over 30 g of protein per meal is “wasted.” For optimal muscle growth, spreading protein across 3–5 meals (20–40 g each) is ideal, but large boluses work well for those following intermittent fasting or one-meal-a-day (OMAD) protocols, enhancing satiety and supporting fat loss.

Caveat: The study used milk protein (80% casein, 20% whey), which digests slowly. More research is needed on faster-digesting proteins like whey or whole foods like meat to confirm these findings.

Clearing Up the Insulin Concern

Some low-carb enthusiasts worry that protein’s insulin spike blocks fat loss. Here’s the deal: whey protein raises both insulin and glucagon, creating a “net neutral” effect on blood sugar. Unlike carbs, which spike insulin alone, protein’s glucagon rise stabilizes glucose, allowing fat breakdown (lipolysis) to continue. Plus, insulin’s anti-catabolic effect helps preserve muscle during fat loss. Studies confirm that high-protein diets drive fat loss, not fat gain.

Practical Tips:

• Aim for 1.6–2.4 g/kg/day (0.7–1.1 g/lb) of protein, especially if you’re resistance training.
• For fasting or OMAD, try 50–100 g protein boluses to meet needs and curb hunger.
• Opt for lean sources like chicken, beef, or eggs, or use whey protein for convenience.

Caffeine: A Subtle but Effective Fat Loss Booster

Caffeine is a well-known pick-me-up, but its fat-loss benefits are more nuanced than you might expect. As a beta-adrenergic agonist, it triggers fat release (lipolysis) and slightly increases fat burning (beta-oxidation). Here’s how it supports your fat-loss goals.

How Caffeine Fuels Fat Loss

Caffeine works in several ways, though its effects are modest:

• Mild appetite suppression: Some studies show a 5% reduction in calorie intake.
• Increased thermic effect of food: Caffeine boosts calorie burn during digestion by 5–10%.
• Enhanced exercise energy expenditure: It can increase calories burned during workouts (e.g., 12 extra calories per 100 burned).
• Boosted lipolysis and fat oxidation: Caffeine shifts calorie burning toward fat stores.

In a recent study, resistance-trained men took a thermogenic supplement with 200 mg caffeine daily for 4 weeks, then 400 mg for another 4 weeks. They lost 1.1% body fat over 8 weeks, while the placebo group lost none. However, this is half the fat loss seen with a 25% caloric deficit (1% per month). A limitation? Diet wasn’t tracked, so caffeine’s appetite-curbing effect may have played a role.

Note: Caffeine didn’t increase non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) in a controlled setting, but real-world scenarios (e.g., fidgeting or doing chores) might show different results.

Caffeine and Exercise: A Winning Combo

Caffeine’s fat-loss effects are stronger when paired with exercise. Taking it before workouts boosts energy expenditure and may enhance fat burning, especially during fasted training. However, its benefits may balance out if taken with food due to the increased thermic effect. More studies are needed to compare fasted vs. fed workouts with caffeine.

Practical Tips:

• Take 100–300 mg caffeine (e.g., coffee or green tea) 30–60 minutes before workouts or with meals.
• Cycle caffeine (e.g., 2 weeks off every 2–3 months) to prevent tolerance.
• Avoid high doses (>400 mg/day) to minimize side effects like jitters or elevated blood pressure.

Exercise: The Cornerstone of Fat Loss

Exercise, especially resistance training, is essential for fat loss. It preserves muscle, revs up your metabolism, and amplifies the effects of protein and caffeine. Studies show that supervised resistance training (e.g., deadlifting 1.25x body weight) combined with high protein leads to significant fat loss and muscle gains. Even moderate exercise enhances caffeine’s benefits, making it a must for any fat-loss plan.

Practical Tip: Aim for 3–5 resistance training sessions per week, focusing on compound lifts like squats, deadlifts, and bench presses.

Bonus: Creatine for Better Performance

While not a direct fat-loss tool, creatine boosts workout performance, helping you maintain intensity during fat-loss phases. Micro-dosing (1–3 g throughout the day) avoids bloating compared to loading (20 g/day). Sugar-free creatine monohydrate stick packs (in flavors like lemon-lime or berry) are a convenient way to sip creatine during workouts.

Practical Tip: Take 3–5 g creatine daily, micro-dosed or post-workout, to support muscle retention.

Your Fat Loss Game Plan

Combine these tools for maximum results:

• Protein: 1.6–2.4 g/kg/day, spread across 3–5 meals or in large boluses for fasting. Choose whole foods or whey.
• Caffeine: 100–300 mg pre-workout or with meals, cycled to stay effective.
• Exercise: 3–5 resistance training sessions weekly to preserve muscle and boost metabolism.
• Creatine: 3–5 g daily to enhance performance.

Protein’s fat-burning power, caffeine’s supportive boost, and exercise’s foundational role form a winning trio for fat loss. Whether you’re juggling a busy schedule or training hard, these science-backed strategies can help you reach your goals.

Disclaimer: Consult a healthcare professional before making significant dietary or supplement changes.